Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

NO1 [K2A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO1 [K2A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig NO1 [K2A1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is an intermediate ancestral branch within the broader NO clade of the Y-chromosome tree, positioned close to the divergence that later produced the major descendant lineages N and O. In phylogenetic terms, it represents a deep paternal lineage associated with the early diversification of northern Eurasian populations during the Late Paleolithic.

Because NO1 is an ancestral intermediate category rather than a widely sampled terminal lineage, most of its historical significance comes from its placement in the tree and from the population history of its descendant branches. The broader NO lineage is generally associated with a major eastward and northward expansion of paternal ancestry in Eurasia, with N becoming especially important in Siberia and northern Eurasia, and O becoming dominant across East, Southeast, and parts of Island Southeast Asia.

Subclades

As an intermediate haplogroup, NO1 is best understood as a phylogenetic bridge rather than a large well-defined population cluster. Its descendant structure connects to the later radiation of:

  • Haplogroup N, which underwent major expansions in northern Eurasia, Siberia, and Uralic-associated populations.
  • Haplogroup O, which expanded widely in East and Southeast Asia and became one of the most common Y-DNA lineages in those regions.

The exact internal structure of NO1 is less archaeologically and demographically visible than that of its descendants, but it is crucial for understanding the deep branching sequence within K2-derived paternal lineages.

Geographical Distribution

Direct observations of ancestral NO-related lineages are expected to be rare, especially in ancient DNA, because deeply ancestral intermediate clades are often represented only by a small number of samples or by inferred phylogenetic nodes. In practice, the geographic footprint of NO1 is inferred from the distributions of the descendant branches of NO:

  • North Eurasia and adjacent regions as the likely homeland of early NO diversification
  • Siberia through lineages related to haplogroup N
  • East Asia through the expansion of haplogroup O
  • Southeast Asia where O lineages later became frequent
  • Uralic-speaking and other northern Eurasian populations through downstream N diversity

This distribution pattern supports a scenario in which the ancestral NO radiation occurred in northern Eurasia, followed by later regional differentiation and expansion.

Historical and Cultural Significance

NO1 itself is not typically tied to a single named archaeological culture, but its importance lies in the deep prehistory of Eurasian populations. The lineage sits near one of the key splits in paternal ancestry that helped shape the genetic landscape of large parts of Asia and northern Eurasia.

The descendants of this branch are associated with major demographic processes during the Late Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and later Neolithic and Bronze Age expansions. Haplogroup N is especially relevant for the spread of paternal lineages into the forest zones of northern Eurasia and later Uralic-speaking communities, while haplogroup O is central to the population history of ancient and modern East and Southeast Asia.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is a rare but highly informative ancestral node within the NO branch of K2. Although it is not usually discussed as a common present-day lineage, its phylogenetic position makes it essential for understanding the deep origins of two of the most important paternal lineages in northern Eurasia and Asia: N and O.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis NO1 [K2A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 NO1 [K2A1 Aktuell ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 NO1 [K2A ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 NO1 [K2 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 NO1 [K ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 NO1 [ ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 NO1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 41 0
7 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 haplogroup NO1 is found include:

  1. Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying ancestral NO-related lineages
  2. Siberian populations, especially those associated with downstream haplogroup N diversity
  3. East Asian populations, especially through the later expansion of haplogroup O
  4. Southeast Asian populations where haplogroup O reached high frequencies
  5. Uralic-associated populations in northern Eurasia through descendant N lineages

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia Low
East Asia Low
Central Asia Low
Northern Asia / Siberia Low
Northern Europe Low
South Asia Low
Northeast Asia Moderate
East Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~50k Jahre zurück

    Jungpaläolithikum

    Fortgeschrittene Werkzeuge, Kunst und kulturelle Vielfalt

  2. ~45k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe NO1 [K2A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  4. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  5. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  6. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  7. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  8. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig NO1 [K2A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu NO1 [K2A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_Sitaimengguying_EN Early Buryat Lena River Culture Lokomotiv Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N Shamanka Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.